Analisis Etika Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Penyelesaian Tugas Akademik Mahasiswa
Main Article Content
Fadila Alquraini
Jibran Andriansyah
Sasta Panca Setia
Tria Yolanda Putri
Bastomi Baharsyah
Pesatnya perkembangan generative artificial intelligence (AI) seperti ChatGPT mengubah cara mahasiswa menyelesaikan tugas akademik dan sekaligus memunculkan persoalan etika, terutama terkait kejujuran akademik, transparansi, dan kemandirian belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis etika penggunaan AI dalam penyelesaian tugas akademik mahasiswa serta merumuskan kerangka penggunaan yang bertanggung jawab. Metode yang digunakan adalah tinjauan pustaka sistematis-naratif terhadap 13 artikel jurnal open access terbitan 2023–2026 yang dianalisis secara tematik berdasarkan lima prinsip etika, yaitu kejujuran akademik, transparansi, akuntabilitas, keadilan, serta privasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa persoalan etika tidak terletak pada penggunaan AI itu sendiri, melainkan pada cara, tujuan, dan keterbukaan penggunaannya. Penelitian ini menyusun spektrum penggunaan AI yang terdiri atas tiga kategori (etis, etis bersyarat, dan tidak etis) serta kerangka yang melibatkan mahasiswa, dosen, dan institusi. Temuan menegaskan bahwa kebijakan yang jelas, literasi AI, dan asesmen autentik lebih menjanjikan daripada larangan total atau pengandalan pada detektor AI semata. Kerangka ini dapat menjadi rujukan awal bagi perguruan tinggi dalam menyusun pedoman penggunaan AI.
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Arbulu Perez Vargas, C. G., Orellana Ulloa, M. N., Gutiérrez Ulloa, C. R., Pizarro Romero, J. M., Gutiérrez Jaramillo, N. D., Cuenca Orellana, H. U., Ayala Anzoátegui, D. X., & López Roca, C. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Huamaní Jordan, O., López Roca, C., & Saavedra Tirado, K. (2024). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75(September), 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13(February), 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., Khan, Z. R., Santos, R., Pavletic, P., & Kravjar, J. (2023). ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
Kovari, A. (2024). Ethical use of ChatGPT in education—Best practices to combat AI-induced plagiarism. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1465703
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5(September), 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., Iahad, N. A., Abdulla, A. A., Akopyan, A., Segura, M. W. A., AlHumaid, J., Allam, M. F., Alló, M., Andoh, R. P. K., Andronic, O., Arthur, Y. D., Aydin, F., Badran, A., Balbontín-Alvarado, R., Saad, H. Ben, … Aristovnik, A. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. In Plos One (Vol. 20, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315011
Shishakly, R., & Nachouki, M. (2026). a G Uide To a Cademic I Ntegrity. Learning, 25.
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(June), 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
